Fabrizio Romano has this morning offered an update on one-time Manchester United starlet Mason Greenwood, with the Getafe loanee facing an uncertain future following the arrival of Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his INEOS powerhouse.
With Greenwood currently plying his trade at the Estadio Coliseum in Spain, Romano has suggested United are yet to make a conclusive decision regarding the player – although the likelihood of a sale would appear to be the most prominent outcome for the 22-year-old attacker.
🚨 Man United have not made final decision yet about Mason Greenwood but feeling is that club will be ready to consider proposals in case of permanent transfer bids.
Man United could cash in on Greenwood this summer, waiting for INEOS verdict after internal talks. pic.twitter.com/PSIcg8xsG0
— Fabrizio Romano (@FabrizioRomano) March 11, 2024
The Bradford native has made 26 appearances in all competitions this season, supplying eight goals and five assists. Following an initial settling-in period, the troubled hitman has found his feet in La Liga, cultivating a reputation as a cult hero amongst the Azulones.
Ratcliffe has set out to create a best-in-class setup at the Manchester Giants, with his renowned right hand, Sir Dave Brailsford, orchestrating the assembly of some of the game’s biggest background names. Amongst the many issues is the financial management regarding players and the mismanagement of fees and wages.
A potential sale would supply a much-needed financial injection for an upcoming transfer summer window – while addressing the inevitable constraints of the club’s financial fair play issues. Let us know what you think – does the player have a future in Manchester, or is it best for all involved to sever ties and close the chapter on Greenwood’s time at Old Trafford?
Subscribe to the Stretty News podcast Strettycast for weekly episodes on Manchester United. You can also sign up for the ad-free Stretty Newsletter. Get the Stretty News verdict on all matters Manchester United.
Mason Greenwood shall stay in man.u.
Just no