Manchester United 2020/21: Progress, not success

As I write this, the overwhelming sense of agony remains. It was to be the baptism of our next generation and instead, we’re left with the familiar feeling of ‘what if’?

There are many negatives highlighted from Wednesday night’s defeat and, without question, they are indeed warranted. The team lacked any real cutting edge and this was compounded by questionable decisions from the sidelines. The game is finished, the result solidified and Ole Gunnar Solskjær’s wait for a trophy continues. However, despite all of this, there is not yet despair, and it would do everybody a great deal of good to take stock in the past two years.

As a player, Solskjær left it all on the pitch. As a manager, he is the literal definition of a man that is trying to reconnect the squad with the fundamental ethos of being Manchester United. This is a task that he inherited and has spent the past two years cultivating. Admittedly, a trophy would make this explanation easier and without such, the same old bunch will gnaw away at any incidental fact. Without question, everybody is entitled to their opinion and should have such without the introduction of hate. In the same vein, ignorance toward obvious progression is nothing other than that – ignorance!

As the curtain closes on the finale of Solskjær’s second full season in the hot-seat, there is much to reflect upon. There are negatives – such as that discussed above – but there are many positives to celebrate. As a regular on the world’s most renowned footballing social platform, there’s an expected contingent who’ve craved for this moment. That, in itself, is an inevitability and one which can supply ample ammunition for those keen to ignore the actual progression on display.

In relation to the league, Solskjær inherited a side that had endured its worst 17-game start since 1990/91 (26 points collected from a possible 51). Since that, we’ve witnessed consecutive top four finishes, growth on final positions and a perennial decrease in the distance from reaching number 21. As a side piece, no side have completed the double over United and Chelsea are yet to place higher than the Norwegian’s side.

As well as the progression in closing the gap, United became the 4th side, in top-flight history, to remain unbeaten (away) for an entire season. Expanding on this, United have not suffered domestic league defeat (away) since January 2020.

The media can’t help themselves with the old comparison. The one that went away very quietly, was that of the trio talk in Ole, Lampard and Arteta. To clarify, Lampard has since lost his job, Arteta has steered Arsenal from 10th to 8th to 8th and Ole has gone from 6th to 3rd to 2nd. Bizarrely enough, it is the reputation of our Norwegian that appears to be continuously targeted.

It’s common knowledge that the players are extremely fond of the manager. His man-management skills have been praised by several members of the team and one need only look at Luke Shaw to see its benefits. On top of this tremendous trait, our proud tradition of promoting from within has been front and center: with 16 academy graduates having made their senior debut since Ole’s appointment, and Greenwood, Williams and Elanga registering their first senior goals.

As I’ve said, it’s not all been plain sailing and there’s much to be critical of. There’s been plenty to solidify the progressive nature of the managers tenure but, a lack of silverware will inevitably catch-up with anybody. A melee of semi-final defeats, coupled with last night’s disappointment, has left fans disenchanted. Ultimately, a team can progress year on year but there needs to be something to show for it.

Despite much disappointment, I firmly believe that the manager has earned the right to be backed this summer. He has achieved so much with such underwhelming support from the owners and endured a daily bashing from media, fans and ex-professionals. There’s this deluded ideal that a continental replacement will unlock some sort of hidden magic and it’s simply convoluted. It’s an idealistic take on a far greater problem: the same problem that has taken the head of three veterans beforehand. However, with this backing and sign of support, the onus will certainly be on the manager to return silverware and I would back this particular ideal.

This season has been progress without being a success. Ole himself acknowledges that last night’s performance was not good enough. He is a fan like you and I, but he has the ability to bring glory days back to United. To conclude with the words of a very wise man – ‘As human beings, you have to understand that adversity is part of your life’.

Read more: Paul Scholes fears Manchester United’s attitude after losing Europa League final

More Stories Manchester United Ole Gunnar Solskjaer


  1. Sorry, I can’t agree. Yes, he’s steadied the ship somewhat but progression, really? The performance on Wed was poor, but that’s the way we play, week after week after week. And it’s all down to Ole’s obsession with playing 4 forwards and only 2 in midfield. When we play against defensive set-ups the full backs push up as well and we end up with 5, sometimes 6, all in a line across the front, all marked up. This leaves no space and no targets for the 2 in mid so they end up tapping the ball about between them. When we don\t break teams down there’s no plan B (so evident on Wed) other than to put more fowards on. Add to this his obsession with playing out from the back when it clearly causes so many problems.

    And there’s clearly no defensive organisation going on. How many times have we been caught out from free-kicks or balls to the back post!

    This has all been happening constantly as witnessed on WEd. The depressing thing for me is that next season is going to be exactly the same.

    Yes, LS improved so much this year, but was that Ole or LS himself? If I look at players such as Rashford, Martial, Williams & Mctom (brillaint on Wed) I see only regression. Even Bruno has got worse for the last few months of the season.

    Unless (and I can’t see this happening whatsoever) Ole changes his tactics then I’m afraid this is as good as it gets.

  2. Big fan ofOle but he got it wrong on Wednesday,Rashford should not have stayed on the pitch he was dreadful,Greenwood who was playing well,should not have been subbed,to then bring Fred on,was the last straw,to me he is poor to say the least.Pogba again did nothing,in a big beek should have been given a chance with Amad and Elanga,and yet another mistake by Lindelof at the back.Overall a poor display.

  3. Attempts to come up with a balanced reportage are always commendable & I give the writer credit for’s undeniable that Ole has definitely brought stability & some level of progress in the team.His man management as argued is quite good.But the jury is still out on him when it comes to his tactical aptitude especially in crunch matches such as the one we witnessed a few days ago. His apparent hesitancy in making critical decisions in situations that call for such also leaves some of us with questions on whether he is capable of taking this team to the level we all are used to.these two flaws are an obvious dent that he needs rectify & are ironically the hallmarks of the greats in the game.It is with this in mind that some of us are a little bit concerned with what looks like an unnecessary rash decision of extending his contract when the key issue at the moment is to give him the financial backing that’ll enable him to get his preferred players. This backing will give him the ideal platform to prove his mettle in his final yr that should act as a decider on whether or not he deserves the extension.he should be given solid backing that’ll leave him with no excuse if he fails to deliver.we shouldn’t also read too much into the impressive away record he has been registered at a time when fans were not in these stadiums.we know how critical fans can be in deciding outcomes of home matches. Not to take anything away from Ole but at times contextualizing these ‘achievements’ does aid in maintaining balance in our analysis.

Comments are closed